<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>wine blogger - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-61dede89" type="application/json"/><link>http://wineblogger.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:14:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Blog</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/blog/#comment-10262090</link><description>Some good points raised in that post.  Will be back to check for more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">craigs2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:14:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/blog/#comment-10261028</link><description>Was a good read.  I'll be back for more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">craigs2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 11:44:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Commenting - A quick lesson in netiquette when entering the conversation</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/commenting-a-quick-lesson-in-netiquette-when-entering-the-conversation/#comment-10241734</link><description>Let me know if you have any questions that come up when writing your post. You can reach me directly @ chris [at] backtype [dot] com. Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">golda</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:09:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Commenting - A quick lesson in netiquette when entering the conversation</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/commenting-a-quick-lesson-in-netiquette-when-entering-the-conversation/#comment-10161652</link><description>Glad you liked the post! I appreciate it greatly!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ryanopaz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:28:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Commenting - A quick lesson in netiquette when entering the conversation</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/commenting-a-quick-lesson-in-netiquette-when-entering-the-conversation/#comment-10158804</link><description>Thanks so much Ryan.  I always enjoy reading your posts and they are very useful. This is a great reminder how important it is to leave comments on fellow blogger's sites.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">grapeinabottle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:03:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Commenting - A quick lesson in netiquette when entering the conversation</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/commenting-a-quick-lesson-in-netiquette-when-entering-the-conversation/#comment-10144384</link><description>Hey Winp, we'll put together a post on backtype for you tomorrow. If you have questions, I trust many others do as well.  Thank so much for asking!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gabriellaopaz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 06:26:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Commenting - A quick lesson in netiquette when entering the conversation</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/commenting-a-quick-lesson-in-netiquette-when-entering-the-conversation/#comment-10111169</link><description>I am also a new blogger, and I don't understand the &lt;a href="http://backtype.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;backtype.com&lt;/a&gt; part...How does one do that? And what does it do?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Winp</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:19:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Commenting - A quick lesson in netiquette when entering the conversation</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/commenting-a-quick-lesson-in-netiquette-when-entering-the-conversation/#comment-9947714</link><description>Really useful, thanks.  It seems so easy to make niave mistakes in the social media world just learning a few of the basics gives newcomers like myself confidence.  And its a lack of confidence that holds people back it can be intimidating a bit like the world of wine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Williams</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:42:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wine Bloggers - One shoe does &amp;#8220;not&amp;#8221; fit all</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/wine-bloggers-one-shoe-does-not-fit-all/#comment-9786123</link><description>I agree comopletely. If have a close look, at least in the German Wine Blogging Scene (which I am a bit more familiar with) there are tons of different blogs and the intensity of the wine topic varies greatly. Not everybody continously writes about wine that calls him/herself a wine blogger.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Muzawo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:36:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/blog/#comment-9616506</link><description>I hope we all learn something new each and everyday.  It is what helps to improve who we are.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tutor1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:58:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: False Truths in Print Media: The Credibility of Wine Blogs as a Publishing Tool Among the Circle of Wine Writers</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/03/false-truths-in-print-media-the-credibility-of-wine-blogs-as-a-publishing-tool-among-the-circle-of-wine-writers/#comment-9499121</link><description>Thank you all for taking the time to comment! I realize that this is a rather heated topic, and if anything, I think it has given us loads to consider in relationship to the future of wine writing. As Jim and Joe have both accurately pointed out, the definition of a wine writer has changed dramatically. However, what may come out of this, or so I hope, is that we have a better chance to evaluate what is quality wine writing, rather than the tool to facilitate the conversation. There are loads of poor print writers, as much as there are heaps of poor wine blog writers. If we can judge each one on their individual merits, as each is aimed at a different audience, it may give us pause on how we can better connect to the future consumer. Keep in mind, this transition and/or transformation is not limited to CWW. These questions are confronting all levels of communication in every sector, and I'm truly excited to see how it evolves.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gabriellaopaz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:00:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: False Truths in Print Media: The Credibility of Wine Blogs as a Publishing Tool Among the Circle of Wine Writers</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/03/false-truths-in-print-media-the-credibility-of-wine-blogs-as-a-publishing-tool-among-the-circle-of-wine-writers/#comment-9497639</link><description>I have been a member of the Circle of Wine Writers for 20 years and editor of its newsletter, Circle Update, since 1991. Over this time the Circle has evolved embracing lecturers and photographers and becoming increasing international. Personally I trust it will continue to evolve and that wine bloggers will become part of its membership.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suggest that Julie Arkell's remarks should be put in context – hitherto the Circle has been an association of people who earn a living either in part or wholly from communicating about wine. The rise of the net and the decline of print opportunities – both magazines and books is changing this dynamic. Few bloggers earn a living from blogging, so one of the criteria used previously to judge whether someone qualifies as a member of the Circle is probably no longer fully applicable.    &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Circle's committee is well aware of the change but as Wink Lorch points out in her post change takes time and Gabriella's post has, I think, moved this process along.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clearly there are blog and blogs and the fact of having a blog is unlikely to be sufficient to give someone membership. I think it is likely that it will be down to the quality of the blog, its audience etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NB This post is my own view – I'm not a member of the Circle's committee.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Budd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:08:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wine Bloggers - One shoe does &amp;#8220;not&amp;#8221; fit all</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/wine-bloggers-one-shoe-does-not-fit-all/#comment-9322572</link><description>Ha!!!  Good one...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">1winedude</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:31:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: False Truths in Print Media: The Credibility of Wine Blogs as a Publishing Tool Among the Circle of Wine Writers</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/03/false-truths-in-print-media-the-credibility-of-wine-blogs-as-a-publishing-tool-among-the-circle-of-wine-writers/#comment-9322568</link><description>Just getting around to reading this (shame on me!).  Late to the party...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, it's all rather... disturbing!  Perhaps the name should be changed to CWWEBITIATW (Circle of Wine Writers Excluding Bloggers If That Is All They Write).  Their stance does relegate blogs to a different (&amp; presumably lower) class of writing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which I find... odd.  Wonder what they'd think of wine bloggers going on press junkets with print media journalists (like I'm doing next week - if only now just to piss them off!)?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">1winedude</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:31:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wine Bloggers - One shoe does &amp;#8220;not&amp;#8221; fit all</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/wine-bloggers-one-shoe-does-not-fit-all/#comment-9259928</link><description>In terms of sorting blogs on sites like wineblogger.info, I think this is a great idea. Not sure it would gain general consensus from the blogosphere.  I think I'd like a further clarification of the categories and what you mean by "Business - Marketing," etc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Wangbickler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 19:00:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The People&amp;#8217;s Wine Press</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/04/the-peoples-wine-press/#comment-9218192</link><description>viva la revolution!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">1WineDude</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:56:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The People&amp;#8217;s Wine Press</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/04/the-peoples-wine-press/#comment-9198081</link><description>Tania, thank you for your continued support! We realize that it's difficult to convey the message regarding the importance of social media and blogging, but it's extremely important if they want their brand to be easily accessible to the international market. And as always, if there is ever any questions you have, please never hesitate to contact us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gabriellaopaz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:39:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The People&amp;#8217;s Wine Press</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/04/the-peoples-wine-press/#comment-9131773</link><description>Luís de Camões, big and not so well loved Portuguese writer said "Times change, wills change. The being changes, the trust changes; the all word is composed by changes, always taking new qualities". &lt;br&gt;I think that for some people change is just so hard... it’s easier to be against that to work with... just don’t give it a lot of attention…&lt;br&gt;Honestly I think you speak for different audience, different target... yours is bigger than his and after all... it’s you that are changing the wine industry! I’ve been reading the things you and other famous wine bloggers write and it’s just great to see the comments that people leave, how interested they are... you communicate with them and that what is important and new!&lt;br&gt;I was present at your workshop in Essência do Vinho and it was the first time I heard about Gary and other famous wine bloggers... You made me open my eyes to a new reality and I just have to thank you for that.&lt;br&gt;One of my concerns at the moment is to inform consumers and small producers (the big already know about you) about your job and I’m doing it with a lot of pleasure.&lt;br&gt;Keep on the good work!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tania branco oliveira</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 12:22:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wine Bloggers - One shoe does &amp;#8220;not&amp;#8221; fit all</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/wine-bloggers-one-shoe-does-not-fit-all/#comment-9128062</link><description>How about making it simple:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Bloggers&lt;br&gt;* Blobbers&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thirstforwine</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:19:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wine Blogger Press Pass</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/wine-blogger-press-pass/#comment-9126360</link><description>Euope gets is earlier. Same situation for Vinitaly. They're startinmg to warm in the US. It's coming</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alfonso Cevola</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 08:46:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: False Truths in Print Media: The Credibility of Wine Blogs as a Publishing Tool Among the Circle of Wine Writers</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/03/false-truths-in-print-media-the-credibility-of-wine-blogs-as-a-publishing-tool-among-the-circle-of-wine-writers/#comment-9106828</link><description>"Bravo" Gabriella for sticking the Catalan boot in a bit, intelligently and energetically, claro. Although I suspect the point was simply to avoid continuing, erm, stretching the precedent of people publishing stuff for free; as thus who needs "professional" wine communicators in the old sense? He says, as someone who earns virtually bugger all from his wine website (which might well be expanded and connected to a 'proper' blog at some point). But i do have plans, as always...&lt;br&gt;Cheers, salut.&lt;br&gt;Richard&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.winewriting.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.winewriting.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.winetravelguides.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.winetravelguides.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard M James</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:38:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wine Blogger Press Pass</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/05/wine-blogger-press-pass/#comment-9075010</link><description>just for info, at Düsseldorfs ProWein bloggers got htis year also the first time the "Press Pass"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:21:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The People&amp;#8217;s Wine Press</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/04/the-peoples-wine-press/#comment-8986323</link><description>Excellent piece Gabriella!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The days of influential wine critics like Robert Parker are numbered.  Sure, they will continue to have suckers for followers but, sooner or later, most wine lovers are smart enough to find the courage to start making their own choices and walk away from dependency on 90-point ratings.  Wine blogs have certainly made wine reviews democratic!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leo Baduria</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:34:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The People&amp;#8217;s Wine Press</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/04/the-peoples-wine-press/#comment-8860710</link><description>Not sure if it came across sufficiently, but my Civil War comment was meant as a joke.  Just considering how the Revolutionary War was eventually followed by the U.S. Civil War.  I don't think there is any Civil War right now, or that anyone is pushing for one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardA</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:14:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The People&amp;#8217;s Wine Press</title><link>http://wineblogger.info/2009/04/the-peoples-wine-press/#comment-8853055</link><description>You bring up a very good point Richard, and I appreciate you putting it out here. And for the record, Tom, and anyone else in this particular camp, is welcome with open arms to the EWBC in Lisbon. I am far from interested in creating a civil war. What I would rather foster is a joint effort to reach the same goal - further developing ways to better educate the consumer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gabriellaopaz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:27:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>